As a partner at Welsh LeBlanc LLP, Jared G. LeBlanc is committed to representing clients in Houston, Texas. He focuses his practice on handling cases that involve energy services, intellectual property, aviation, oil and gas, trade secrets and commercial construction.

Mr. LeBlanc graduated with high honors and a Bachelor of Arts in philosophy from the University of St. Thomas. He then earned a Juris Doctor in 2004 from the South Texas College of Law, where he served as associate editor of the school's law review. While in law school, Mr. LeBlanc participated in, and won, the state moot court competition. He also received the Bodman Foundation Award for Excellence in Legal Writing.

With more than a decade of experience, Mr. LeBlanc has taken cases to trial in both state and federal courts. Employing a tactical approach to each matter, Mr. LeBlanc makes every effort to understand his clients' goals and works tenaciously to achieve them. He believes in keeping open communication with clients so they know how their case is progressing. Mr. LeBlanc is admitted to practice before the United States District Courts for the Northern, Southern, Eastern and Western Districts of Texas, the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit and the Supreme Court of the United States.

Due to his strong work ethic and attention to detail, Mr. LeBlanc has built a track record of skillful advocacy for his clients. His successes include defending a National Football League coach who was sued by a former player. For his achievements, Mr. LeBlanc has earned the highest rating possible of AV Preeminent* from Martindale-Hubbell.

Mr. LeBlanc is admitted to the State Bar of Texas. When he is not in the courtroom, he enjoys spending time with is wife and two rescue dogs.

* AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories: legal ability and general ethical standards.